Latest corrections and clarifications from the Telegraph

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/telegraph-corrections-and-clarifications/

As many of these articles have been popular here turns out they had to make corrections and clarification for many lately. Wish we had a website that had all the press corrections in one place

February 11, 2025

An article ‘Defence is more important than net zero’ (Dec, 6) referred to Labour’s drive for net zero by 2030. In fact Labour’s plan was to decarbonise the energy sector by 2030. We are happy to correct the record.

February 7, 2025

An article “Extend child puberty blocker ban to sex change hormones, Wes Streeting told” (Jan, 31) reported that Keira Bell won a case in 2020 against the Tavistock Clinic. Although she won in the High Court, the decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. We are happy to correct the record

February 5, 2025

In an article “We have no clue how many people live in Britain - and Starmer doesn’t care” (Jan,23) it was stated that one in 12 people in London is an illegal migrant. The figure is up to one in 13 in the Thames Water London Water Resource Zone , which does not cover the whole of London. We are happy to correct the record.

February 4, 2025

In an article “Enough learnt helplessness. Here’s how Britain ends illegal immigration” (Jan, 24) it was stated that one in 12 people in London is an illegal migrant. The figure is up to one in 13 in the Thames Water London Water Resource Zone, which does not cover the whole of London. We are happy to correct the record.

January 31, 2025

In an online article “Up to one in 12 in London is an illegal migrant” (Jan, 22), the figure of 7,044,667 was the estimated population of the Thames Water London Water Resource Zone, excluding irregular migrants, not geographical London which is about 9 million. “Up to 1 in 12 illegal migrants” was incorrect and ought to have been “up to 1 in 13”, based on the study’s upper figure for irregular migrants, which includes children born in the UK with irregular status and, it is understood, those with indefinite leave to remain. We are happy to correct the record