Man from Zamzam camp explains what happened when a Sudanese army airstrike landed on his house and injured four children, insisting on the captain being RSF and explaining that the army wouldn't target civilians on purpose

There is this trend where RSF activists, both Sudanese and outsiders (self-admitted Americans even) will wait for the RSF to commit an atrocity and then attempt to raise a similar atrocity in order to minimize the RSF's evil. It's a tu-quo-que fallacy, which is an appeal to hypocrisy, as fits perfectly with these German, British, American, French cosplaying as actual Sudanese with our values, culture and beliefs, while having a concept of Sudan that conforms perfectly to their governments stances (most of these governments are complicit in the genocide).

Not only is it hypocritical but it stems from a dehumanization of Sudanese people which allows them to use the tragedy of one Sudanese against the other, as if they are counterbalancing statistics

Most recently a user notorious for speaking mostly on the army and avoiding criticisms of the RSF tried to do the same when a post was made about the RSF's most recent bombing of Zamzam camp. This Western diaspora kid tried to quote a post from Radio Dabanga, discussing an airstrike on Zamzam camp, insinuating that "the army and the RSF are both killing innocent civilians."

Problem ? I had talked to that man back in August to get his perspective, I asked neutrally "what happened to today?"

His and his neighbours initial response: "The captain of the plane must have been RSF" and later "the Sudanese Air Force was trying to bomb RSF positions but they accidentally dropped the bomb too early but thank God, not too much damage occured"

This conforms to the overall work done by my friends at Voices of Darfur, where local journalists would interview residents of Al-Fashir and Zamzam and always end upon the same conclusion: the RSF is the aggressor.

It's extremely disturbing when people who hail from those countries directly complicit in the genocide attempt to highjack the voices of Sudanese people on the ground to advance their disgusting agenda of both-siding a conflict, when the people they use disagree with them and when the lines have been drawn clearly from day one, as per the majority of Sudanese people on the ground.